5 Comments

Trump's 34 felony counts made it into court, where he got convicted. He set a record. Isn't this the egomaniac who wants to break records every day? So he should be happy. He set yet another record; that of being the first President dumb enough to get caught. No worries to all politicians on both sides of the aisle; from now on every effort and tax dollar shall be spend to catch every other President on something, so that we can keep the lawyers busy. Remember Kenneth Starr? Who, between the mid to late-nineties spent over 95 million of our tax dollars researching the Clintons. 6.5 million alone on a blow job controversy by a women in a blue dress. Impeachment became the tit for tat. As of last week, that will go up a notch. Courts get ready.

Expand full comment

See here https://www.dailywire.com/news/verdict-trump-found-guilty-on-all-charges-in-hush-money-case?topStoryPosition=1lAnyone who litigates in the NY State Courts knows that the Appellate Division, the intermediate appellate court and the Court of Appeals, the highest court in the state, are not Trump''s best hope for a reversal and dismissal; of a conviction. Trump probably will exhaust his pre and post appeal remedies in NY and seek review by SCOTUS of the massive constitutional infirmities and violations in this conviction, or seek an expedited review by SCOTUS .

Expand full comment

I’m hoping SCOTUS takes up the expedited review due to the astronomical level of egregious malpractice exhibited during this case.

HOWEVER, they (read John Roberts) do have precedence for being quite cowardly when it comes to getting into the middle of such major issues. They shunted off a myriad of genuinely solid 2020 election fraud cases because of the backlash they received after their Bush v. Gore decision.

Let’s hope they’ve grown some balls since then, and truly grasp the Constitutional and potentially national crisis this flagrantly unjust case threatens to unleash, or actually, already has.

Expand full comment

For both sides of the aisle please. Not when it suits just one party.

Expand full comment

If they actually follow the Constitution and the Rule of Law that’s automatic.

As opposed to the Left’s “rules for thee, but not for me” lawfare applications.

Expand full comment